Physics / The Vibration of Strings
FREE TO EXPLORE
EXPERIMENT 41 · PHYSICS LABORATORY

The Vibration of Strings theory

Understand the vibration of strings: the equations, assumptions, supporting concepts and measurement method.

THE WORKING RELATIONSHIP
L = \left(\frac{v}{2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{f}\right) \iff y = m x + b \iff v = 2 m, \quad \mu = \frac{T}{v^2} = \frac{M g}{4 m^2}

Keep the physical quantities, graph variables and units consistent.

01D'Alembert's 1D Wave Equation and Transverse Wave Speed

The dynamics of a stretched flexible string represent the prototypical 1D wave system in continuum mechanics. Consider an infinitesimal string segment of unstretched length dx and linear mass density μ under mechanical tension T. When displaced transversely by a small deflection y(x, t), the net vertical restoring force acting on the element arises from the difference in the vertical components of tension at its ends: dF_y = T sin(θ + dθ) − T sin(θ) ≈ T (∂²y/∂x²) dx, under the small-angle approximation where tan(θ) ≈ ∂y/∂x. Applying Newton's second law to the segment mass dm = μ dx yields: μ dx (∂²y/∂t²) = T (∂²y/∂x²) dx. Dividing by μ dx produces d'Alembert's classic 1D wave equation: ∂²y/∂t² = (T / μ) (∂²y/∂x²). Comparing this with the standard wave equation ∂²y/∂t² = v² (∂²y/∂x²) identifies the transverse wave propagation speed: v = √(T / μ). This fundamental relation demonstrates that the speed of transverse mechanical waves depends exclusively on the restoring tension T (the elastic stiffness factor) and the linear density μ (the inertial factor). For a steel wire (diameter d = 0.50 mm, μ = 1.541 g/m) under a tension of T = 29.42 N (load mass M = 3.0 kg), transverse waves propagate at v = √(29.42 / 0.001541) = 138.16 m/s.

\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = \frac{T}{\mu} \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2} \implies v = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} = \sqrt{\frac{M g}{\rho \frac{\pi d^2}{4}}}
How does increasing the suspended load mass on a sonometer wire from 1 kg to 4 kg affect the transverse wave speed?

Because transverse wave speed is proportional to the square root of tension (v = √(T/μ)), quadrupling the suspended mass (multiplying T by 4) exactly doubles the wave speed: v_new = √4 · v_old = 2 v_old.

02Mersenne's Laws: History, Formulation, and Empirical Proof

In 1636, French polymath Marin Mersenne published 'Harmonie Universelle', establishing the empirical relationships that govern vibrating strings. By subjecting strings of various lengths, tensions, and materials to rigorous pitch comparison, Mersenne deduced three fundamental proportionalities that form the cornerstone of musical acoustics: (1) First Law (Length): At constant tension and linear density, fundamental frequency is inversely proportional to vibrating length: f ∝ 1/L. Halving the length raises the pitch by an exact octave (ratio 2:1). (2) Second Law (Tension): At constant length and linear density, fundamental frequency is directly proportional to the square root of tension: f ∝ √T. To raise the pitch by an octave, the tension must be increased by a factor of four. (3) Third Law (Linear Density): At constant length and tension, fundamental frequency is inversely proportional to the square root of linear mass density: f ∝ 1/√μ. For strings of identical material (density ρ), linear density scales with cross-sectional area: μ = ρ (π d² / 4), so that frequency is inversely proportional to wire diameter: f ∝ 1/d. Combining all three laws yields the unified formula f = (1 / 2L) √(T / μ), which Brook Taylor formally derived from dynamic principles in 1713.

f_1 = \frac{1}{2 L} \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} \implies f_1 \propto \frac{1}{L}, \quad f_1 \propto \sqrt{T}, \quad f_1 \propto \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu}} \propto \frac{1}{d}
If you wish to double the fundamental frequency of a sonometer wire without changing its length or material, how must the hanging weight be adjusted?

From Mersenne's second law (f ∝ √T), doubling the frequency requires increasing the mechanical tension by a factor of 2² = 4; thus, the hanging weight must be made four times as large.

03Normal Modes, Standing Waves, and Boundary Conditions

When a stretched string is terminated by rigid bridges at x = 0 and x = L, boundary conditions enforce zero displacement at both extremities: y(0, t) = 0 and y(L, t) = 0. Expressing the transverse wave motion as a Fourier superposition of standing normal modes, the spatial shape function must satisfy Y(x) = A sin(k x). Enforcing Y(L) = A sin(k L) = 0 restricts the allowable wavenumbers to discrete eigenvalues: k_n L = n π for integer n = 1, 2, 3, ... Substituting k_n = 2π / λ_n yields the wavelength quantization condition: L = n (λ_n / 2) ⟹ λ_n = 2L / n. The corresponding harmonic frequencies are f_n = v / λ_n = n [v / (2L)] = n f₁, with n = 1 (fundamental), n = 2 (second harmonic / first overtone, octave), n = 3 (third harmonic, twelfth), n = 4 (fourth harmonic, double octave), etc. Because a string fixed at both ends satisfies symmetric boundary conditions identical to an open organ pipe, it generates a complete harmonic spectrum containing all integer multiples (1f, 2f, 3f, 4f, ...). Plucking or bowing the string at different fractional positions excites specific subsets of these normal modes, shaping the harmonic spectrum and timbre.

L = n \frac{\lambda_n}{2} \implies \lambda_n = \frac{2 L}{n}, \qquad f_n = n \frac{v}{2 L} = n f_1 \quad (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, \dots)
Where should a student touch a vibrating string lightly while plucking it to suppress the fundamental mode and isolate the first overtone (second harmonic)?

The student should touch the string lightly at its exact midpoint (x = L/2). This forces a displacement node at the center, suppressing the fundamental mode (which requires an antinode at L/2) and allowing the second harmonic (which naturally has a node at L/2) to ring freely at double frequency (2f₁).

04Sympathetic Resonance, Acoustic Impedance, and Paper Riders

Direct plucking of a thin string produces remarkably little sound because the small wire surface area has extremely poor acoustic impedance matching with the unconfined air (Z_air = 415 Pa s/m), radiating virtually no acoustic power. In a sonometer, the string rests upon hardwood bridges mounted directly on a hollow spruce soundboard. When the string vibrates, its transverse dynamic forces drive the bridges, which flex the large wooden soundboard. Because the soundboard has a large surface area, it radiates sound into the air with hundreds of times greater acoustic efficiency. Conversely, when an external tuning fork is struck and its stem is pressed against the soundboard, the process reverses: vibrational acoustic energy transmits through the soundboard into the bridges and excites transverse waves in the wire. Under non-resonant conditions, this forced excitation produces microscopic wire amplitudes. However, when the natural fundamental frequency of the wire segment matches the driving frequency of the fork (f_string = f_fork), resonant constructive interference builds up standing wave energy cycle after cycle, amplifying the midpoint displacement until a lightweight paper rider straddling the antinode is agitated violently and thrown clear of the wire. This sympathetic resonance provides an objective, visual indicator of resonance requiring zero electrical instrumentation.

Z_{\text{mech}} = \frac{F}{u}, \qquad P_{\text{rad}} = \frac{1}{2} R_{\text{rad}} u_{\text{board}}^2 \gg P_{\text{wire}}
Why is a sonometer wire virtually inaudible when stretched between rigid metal posts in open air, but loudly audible when mounted on a wooden soundboard?

A thin wire has tiny surface area and cannot effectively move surrounding air parcels (acoustic impedance mismatch). The wooden soundboard acts as an acoustic transformer, converting the high-force, low-velocity bridge vibrations into large-area, low-pressure acoustic wavefronts that radiate sound efficiently.

05Acoustic Beats: Interference in the Time Domain

When two acoustic harmonic sources of slightly different frequencies f₁ and f₂ vibrate simultaneously, their superposition produces the phenomenon of acoustic beats. Let the acoustic pressure waves arriving at the listener's ear be p₁(t) = A cos(2π f₁ t) and p₂(t) = A cos(2π f₂ t). Applying the trigonometric sum-to-product identity yields: p_tot(t) = 2 A cos[2π (f₁ − f₂) / 2 · t] cos[2π (f₁ + f₂) / 2 · t]. This represents a high-frequency carrier wave vibrating at the average frequency f_avg = (f₁ + f₂) / 2 whose amplitude is slowly modulated by an envelope cos[2π (f_beat / 2) t]. Because acoustic loudness (intensity) is proportional to the square of pressure amplitude, loudness peaks occur twice per envelope cycle, yielding a beat frequency equal to the absolute difference: f_beat = |f₁ − f₂|. When tuning a sonometer wire to a tuning fork, the experimenter listens for these rapid pulsations in volume. As the bridge is adjusted toward perfect unison, the beat frequency decreases: 8 beats/s → 4 beats/s → 2 beats/s → 1 beat every several seconds. When the beats vanish entirely, the wire is tuned to exact mathematical unison with the fork.

p_{\text{tot}}(t) = 2 A \cos\left(2\pi \frac{f_1 - f_2}{2} t\right) \cos\left(2\pi \frac{f_1 + f_2}{2} t\right) \implies f_{\text{beat}} = |f_1 - f_2|
If a tuning fork of 256 Hz is sounded alongside a sonometer wire and 3 distinct beats are heard per second, what are the two possible fundamental frequencies of the wire?

The beat frequency is f_beat = |f_fork − f_wire| = 3 Hz. Therefore, the wire frequency is either 256 + 3 = 259 Hz (sharp) or 256 − 3 = 253 Hz (flat).

06Linear Regression Formulation and Transverse Velocity Isolation

To determine the transverse wave speed and linear mass density without relying on a single fallible measurement, experimentalists record the fundamental resonant segment length L across a calibrated set of tuning forks of known frequencies f. From the fundamental standing wave relation L = λ₁ / 2 = v / (2f), rearranging yields: L = (v / 2) (1 / f). Designating x = 1 / f (in seconds) as the independent variable and y = L (in metres) as the dependent variable, the data fit the canonical linear regression equation y = m x + b. Here, the slope m represents half of the transverse wave velocity: m = v / 2, which allows the wave speed to be determined directly as v = 2m. Crucially, ordinary least-squares regression averages out random bridge setting errors across all frequency stations. Once v is obtained, the linear mass density μ of the wire is calculated from the known mechanical tension T = M g via μ = T / v² = M g / (4m²). Furthermore, the vertical intercept b evaluates whether any zero-offset or bridge knife-edge indentation error is present (theoretically b = 0). Comparing experimental linear density μ_exp with the gravimetric value μ = m_wire / L_wire or micrometer value μ = ρ (π d² / 4) provides rigorous confirmation of continuum mechanics.

L = m \left(\frac{1}{f}\right) + b \implies m = \frac{v}{2} \iff v = 2 m, \qquad \mu = \frac{T}{v^2} = \frac{M g}{4 m^2}
What is the physical significance of the slope m when plotting the resonant segment length L against reciprocal frequency 1/f for a sonometer?

The slope m represents one-half of the transverse wave propagation speed along the wire: m = v/2. Multiplying the regression slope by 2 yields the true wave speed v = 2m.

07Engineering Applications: Piano String Scaling and String Inharmonicity

Mersenne's laws govern the design and scaling of all stringed musical instruments, most notably the concert grand piano. A standard piano spans over seven octaves from A0 (27.5 Hz) to C8 (4186 Hz)—a frequency ratio of more than 150:1. If piano designers relied solely on Mersenne's first law (f ∝ 1/L) with uniform steel wire, an 88-key piano whose treble strings are 5 cm long would require bass strings exceeding 7.5 metres (25 feet!) in length. To maintain a practical instrument length (~2 to 3 metres), piano makers combine all three of Mersenne's laws: bass strings are made with thicker steel cores and wrapped with dense copper wire winding. The copper winding increases the linear mass density μ by a factor of over 100 without increasing the bending stiffness of the steel core, lowering the fundamental pitch into the deep bass register. However, real piano strings possess finite bending stiffness (elastic modulus E), which adds a small restoring moment to tension. This bending stiffness makes the string behave slightly like a rigid bar, shifting overtones slightly sharp according to Fletcher's inharmonicity formula: f_n ≈ n f₁ √(1 + B n²), where B = (π³ E d⁴) / (64 T L²) is the inharmonicity coefficient. Piano tuners must 'stretch' piano octave tuning to compensate for this physical inharmonicity.

f_n \approx n f_1 \sqrt{1 + B n^2}, \qquad B = \frac{\pi^3 E d^4}{64 T L^2}
Why are the lowest bass strings of a piano wrapped with copper wire rather than simply made from solid, extra-thick steel wire?

Solid thick steel wire has excessive flexural (bending) stiffness, which destroys acoustic harmonicity and makes overtones sharply out of tune (inharmonicity). Wrapping a thin steel core with soft copper coils adds linear mass density μ without significantly increasing bending stiffness, maintaining a musical, harmonious tone.

↳
Connect the equations to a measurement.

The sonometer experiment provides a definitive validation of Mersenne's acoustic laws for continuous 1D elastic media. By tuning the string segment between movable fret bridges to unison with calibrated tuning forks using sympathetic paper rider ejection and beat minimization, students confirm the half-wave relation L = (v/2)(1/f). Linear regression yields the transverse propagation speed v = 138.2 m s⁻¹ and wire linear density μ = 1.541 g m⁻¹ with exceptional precision, demonstrating the physical foundation of stringed musical instrument acoustics.