Simple pendulum theory
Understand simple pendulum: the equations, assumptions, supporting concepts and measurement method.
01What counts as one oscillation?
A period is the time to return to the same position with the same direction of motion. Starting at the centre moving right, the next centre crossing moving left is only half a period. Count full cycles by watching one centre crossing direction. Frequency is the number of full cycles per second; angular frequency measures phase change in radians per second.
Is a left-to-right centre crossing followed by a right-to-left crossing one complete oscillation?
No. It is half an oscillation. Wait for the next left-to-right crossing to complete the cycle.
02Restoring force and the small-angle model
The component of gravity along the bob's arc pulls it toward equilibrium. Tension acts along the string, keeping the motion on the arc. Dividing tangential acceleration by length gives theta-double-dot = -(g/L)sin(theta). For small angles in radians, replace sin(theta) by theta; this creates the linear equation of simple harmonic motion. Use an initial angle at most 5 degrees so this approximation is appropriate. The simulation uses this limiting equation rather than modelling the small finite-amplitude correction.
Why keep the release angle small?
The linear period formula relies on sin(theta) approximately equalling theta; large swings have a longer period than this model predicts.
03Effective length and mass independence
The effective length L runs from the pivot to the bob's centre of mass, not just along the exposed string. In the point-bob model the same bob mass appears in the gravitational force and inertia, so it cancels. Increasing bob mass alone therefore does not change the model period. A large bob, a heavy string, or a flexible support changes the physical system and may require a more complete description.
Should you measure to the top or centre of the bob?
Measure from the pivot to the centre of mass, approximately the geometric centre for a uniform spherical bob.
04Why time 20 cycles?
A single stopwatch start-and-stop interval has endpoint reaction error. Spreading that interval over N = 20 cycles reduces its contribution to the period uncertainty by the factor N. It does not remove a miscount, a biased timer, or a length error. Record repeated 20-cycle runs at each length, average their elapsed times, then divide by 20. The virtual timer is a teaching tool and has no human reaction time unless an explicit noise model is added.
Does a timer with a 0.01 s display guarantee a 0.01 s physical timing uncertainty?
No. Resolution is only one contribution; reaction time, cycle counting and run-to-run scatter can dominate.
05Straight-line analysis
Squaring the period formula gives T squared proportional to L. Plot L in metres on the horizontal axis and T squared in seconds squared on the vertical axis. Fit y = mL + b using several well-spaced lengths. The gradient has units s squared per metre, and g is 4pi squared divided by the gradient. The ideal intercept is zero. Fit an intercept initially: a persistent nonzero value can flag a fixed length offset or another systematic effect, although a zero intercept alone does not prove accuracy.
What is the unit of the graph gradient?
Seconds squared per metre, because the vertical quantity is T squared and the horizontal quantity is length.
06Uncertainty and responsible conclusions
For a timing-derived period, the first-order uncertainty in T squared is 2T u(T). If the fitted gradient has uncertainty u(m), the relative gradient contribution to u(g) equals u(m)/m. Length uncertainty also matters: an ordinary least-squares fit treats horizontal coordinates as exact, so use a suitable fit or discuss that limitation when length errors are significant. The model uses g = 9.80665 m/s squared as a reference parameter, not a measured local value. Perfect virtual agreement tests the algebra and software; it does not establish laboratory accuracy.
Can perfectly collinear simulated points justify reporting zero uncertainty for a real experiment?
No. They show consistency of the ideal generator; a physical experiment still has timing, length, alignment and model uncertainties.
The timing model includes the leading finite-amplitude correction T ≈ 2π√(L/g)[1 + θ₀²/16 + 11θ₀⁴/3072], with θ₀ in radians. The simple graph analysis neglects this correction, giving a small systematic bias even at 3°. Angles above 5° remain available for exploration but cannot be recorded.