1. Title and aim
Half-Wave Dipole Antenna E-Plane and H-Plane Polar Radiation Patterns and Gain. Measure the azimuthal E-plane (figure-eight) and elevation H-plane (omnidirectional) radiation patterns of a 2.4 GHz resonant half-wave dipole, verifying linear power transfer in the far field.
2. Abstract
Laboratory evaluation of Half-Wave Dipole Antenna E-Plane and H-Plane Polar Radiation Patterns and Gain was conducted across six calibrated telecommunication setpoints. Measured telemetry was linearized, yielding a correlation coefficient R² = 1.000000. The experimental parameter Far-Field System Transfer Slope was estimated as 1.0000 dB/dB, comparing against the reference benchmark of 1.0000 dB/dB with a relative percentage deviation of 0.0000%.
3. Apparatus and fixed settings
- Half-Wave Dipole Antenna Telecommunication Workstation: Provides regulated RF/baseband excitation, precision impedance-matched test fixtures, and low-noise interconnection for half-power beamwidth (hpbw), radiation resistance (73 ω) & friis transmission formula.
- 6.5-Digit True-RMS Digital Multimeter (Keysight / Fluke): Measures DC bias points, RMS carrier/signal voltages, and circuit node potentials with ±0.0035% baseline accuracy.
- Four-Channel Digital Storage Oscilloscope (200 MHz, 2 GSa/s): Captures high-frequency RF envelopes, baseband eye diagrams, constellation patterns, and transient responses for half-wave dipole antenna.
- Synthesized Vector RF Signal Generator (9 kHz – 3 GHz): Delivers calibrated, low-phase-noise continuous-wave and modulated carrier signals to establish transmitter power conditions.
- High-Dynamic-Range RF Spectrum Analyzer (9 kHz – 3.6 GHz): Quantifies fundamental harmonic amplitudes, carrier suppression ratios, sideband power distributions, and spurious emissions.
- Matched 50-Ohm Coaxial Interconnects & Attenuator Set: Maintains uniform transmission line impedance, eliminates unwanted standing-wave reflections, and protects instrument front-ends.
- Environmental Conditions: 23.5 °C ambient, 45% relative humidity, 101.3 kPa atmospheric pressure.
- Excitation Calibration: Locked to OCXO reference oscillator with frequency stability < 1 × 10⁻⁸.
4. Theory and graph choice
Measure the azimuthal E-plane (figure-eight) and elevation H-plane (omnidirectional) radiation patterns of a 2.4 GHz resonant half-wave dipole, verifying linear power transfer in the far field.
Plotting Transmitter RF power P_t (dBm) on the horizontal axis and Received power P_r (dBm) on the vertical axis yields a linear characteristic whose slope verifies the Half-Wave Dipole Antenna analytical model.
5. Method
- Inspect all coaxial BNC/SMA interconnects and verify 50-ohm characteristic termination. Power up all instruments and allow a 20-minute thermal settling period to stabilize crystal reference oscillators.
- Configure the synthesized RF signal generator and baseband source to the specified baseline parameters. Calibrate the transmitter power using the precision digital multimeter and oscilloscope.
- Increment the transmitter power systematically across the experimental range (5.0 to 30.0 dBm), logging the resulting received power at boresight p_r after signal settling.
- Observe and photograph the corresponding waveform on the digital storage oscilloscope and verify the spectral distribution on the RF spectrum analyzer. Verify that harmonic distortion remains below -45 dBc.
- Execute both ascending and descending parameter sweeps across the device under test (DUT) to detect any thermal drift, detector non-linearity, or oscillator pulling.
- Safely reduce RF excitation levels, save captured digital waveforms to non-volatile storage, export telemetry to the laboratory logbook, and power down all high-frequency instrumentation.
6. Observations and calculation table
All communication observations use strictly controlled 64-bit IEEE 754 precision buffers. Residuals are computed relative to the ordinary least-squares regression line.
| No. | Transmitter RF Power Level P_t (dBm) | Received Power at Boresight P_r (dBm) | Transmitter RF power P_t (dBm) | Received power P_r (dBm) | Fitted y | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.0 | -13.5 | 5.0000 | -13.5000 | -13.5000 | 0.0000 |
| 2 | 10.0 | -8.5 | 10.0000 | -8.5000 | -8.5000 | 0.0000 |
| 3 | 15.0 | -3.5 | 15.0000 | -3.5000 | -3.5000 | 0.0000 |
| 4 | 20.0 | 1.5 | 20.0000 | 1.5000 | 1.5000 | 0.0000 |
| 5 | 25.0 | 6.5 | 25.0000 | 6.5000 | 6.5000 | 0.0000 |
| 6 | 30.0 | 11.5 | 30.0000 | 11.5000 | 11.5000 | 0.0000 |
Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓
7. Worked calculation for one observation
8. Graph, gradient and final calculation
Circular markers represent empirical communication observations. The solid line represents the ordinary least-squares linear fit.
Σ(x − x̄)² = 437.5000
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 437.5000
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 1.00000000
b = ȳ − mx̄ = -18.50000000
Far-Field System Transfer Slope = 1.00000 dB/dB
9. Uncertainty and comparison
Percentage difference = |estimate − theoretical value| / |theoretical value| × 100 = 0.0000%.
For n = 6 observations, Σresidual² = 0.0000; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 0.0000. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 0.0000.
Propagating the fit parameters yields a fit standard error of 0.0000 dB/dB, with an ideal coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000.
Instrumental and regression uncertainty for Half-Wave Dipole Antenna is constrained within 0.02% of full-scale calibration standards.
10. Result and discussion
Theoretical reference value: 1.0000 dB/dB
Experimental observations across all test trials demonstrate strict agreement with theoretical communication channel models. OLS regression slope evaluated to 1.000000 with intercept -18.500000, validating the governing equation P_r = 1.0000 · P_t - 18.5000 with R² = 1.000000.
11. Precautions and limitations
- Never exceed the maximum rated RF input power (+20 dBm / 100 mW) of the spectrum analyzer or vector network analyzer input mixer.
- Ensure all coaxial cable shields and equipment chassis are securely bonded to a common low-impedance earth ground to prevent 50/60 Hz hum pickup.
- When handling optical fiber facets and high-frequency microwave components, avoid direct eye exposure to laser apertures and protect microstrip lines from electrostatic discharge (ESD).
- Verify that 50-ohm through-terminations are securely fastened to unused oscilloscope and analyzer ports to eliminate high-frequency signal reflections.
Channel modeled under additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and linear band-limited propagation. Harmonic distortion remains constrained below -45 dBc across all calibrated test points.
12. Conclusion
The experimental determination of Half-Wave Dipole Antenna E-Plane and H-Plane Polar Radiation Patterns and Gain confirmed the theoretical model within an experimental uncertainty of 0.0000%. The standard calibration protocol ensures reproducible laboratory characterization.
In-Depth Technical Supplement & Signal Processing Derivation
1. Title and Objective
Half-Wave Dipole Antenna E-Plane and H-Plane Polar Radiation Patterns and Gain. Measure the azimuthal E-plane (figure-eight) and elevation H-plane (omnidirectional) radiation patterns of a 2.4 GHz resonant half-wave dipole, verifying linear power transfer in the far field. This formal laboratory report documents experimental data acquisition, mathematical model calibration, regression analysis, error propagation, and physical parameter extraction for half-wave dipole antenna.
2. Abstract
An experimental investigation of half-wave dipole antenna was conducted using high-precision telecommunication instrumentation across six systematic setpoints of transmitter power ranging from 5.0 to 30.0 dBm. Measured received power at boresight p_r data were logged using 6.5-digit digital multimeters, digital storage oscilloscopes, and RF spectrum analyzers. Ordinary least-squares regression yielded an empirical calibration line of P_r = 1.0000 · P_t - 18.5000 with a coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000. The derived experimental parameter Far-Field System Transfer Slope was evaluated as 1.0 dB/dB, demonstrating complete agreement with theoretical benchmark expectations within 0.02% experimental error.
3. Experimental Apparatus & Standard Settings
- Half-Wave Dipole Antenna Telecommunication Workstation: Provides regulated RF/baseband excitation, precision impedance-matched test fixtures, and low-noise interconnection for half-power beamwidth (hpbw), radiation resistance (73 ω) & friis transmission formula.
- 6.5-Digit True-RMS Digital Multimeter (Keysight / Fluke): Measures DC bias points, RMS carrier/signal voltages, and circuit node potentials with ±0.0035% baseline accuracy.
- Four-Channel Digital Storage Oscilloscope (200 MHz, 2 GSa/s): Captures high-frequency RF envelopes, baseband eye diagrams, constellation patterns, and transient responses for half-wave dipole antenna.
- Synthesized Vector RF Signal Generator (9 kHz – 3 GHz): Delivers calibrated, low-phase-noise continuous-wave and modulated carrier signals to establish transmitter power conditions.
- High-Dynamic-Range RF Spectrum Analyzer (9 kHz – 3.6 GHz): Quantifies fundamental harmonic amplitudes, carrier suppression ratios, sideband power distributions, and spurious emissions.
- Matched 50-Ohm Coaxial Interconnects & Attenuator Set: Maintains uniform transmission line impedance, eliminates unwanted standing-wave reflections, and protects instrument front-ends.
- Environmental Ambient Conditions: Ambient laboratory temperature 23.5 ± 0.5 °C; relative humidity 45 ± 5%; atmospheric pressure 101.3 kPa.
- Excitation Calibration Settings: Synthesized RF carrier oscillator locked to an internal oven-controlled crystal reference (OCXO) with frequency stability < 1 × 10⁻⁸.
4. Theory & Graphical Coordinate Selection
According to the governing principles of half-wave dipole antenna, the communication response follows the linear transformation:
To evaluate the intrinsic physical parameter (Far-Field System Transfer Slope), the experimental data are plotted with Transmitter RF power P_t (dBm) on the horizontal abscissa and Received power P_r (dBm) on the vertical ordinate. The gradient of the resulting least-squares linear line directly yields the parameter magnitude.
5. Step-by-Step Experimental Method
- Apparatus Calibration & Ground Plane Verification: Inspect all coaxial BNC/SMA interconnects and verify 50-ohm characteristic termination. Power up all instruments and allow a 20-minute thermal settling period to stabilize crystal reference oscillators.
- Carrier & Modulating Signal Synthesis: Configure the synthesized RF signal generator and baseband source to the specified baseline parameters. Calibrate the transmitter power using the precision digital multimeter and oscilloscope.
- Systematic Telemetry Acquisition & Setpoint Stepping: Increment the transmitter power systematically across the experimental range (5.0 to 30.0 dBm), logging the resulting received power at boresight p_r after signal settling.
- Frequency-Domain & Time-Domain Cross-Validation: Observe and photograph the corresponding waveform on the digital storage oscilloscope and verify the spectral distribution on the RF spectrum analyzer. Verify that harmonic distortion remains below -45 dBc.
- Repeatability & Hysteresis Verification: Execute both ascending and descending parameter sweeps across the device under test (DUT) to detect any thermal drift, detector non-linearity, or oscillator pulling.
- De-energization & Dataset Archival: Safely reduce RF excitation levels, save captured digital waveforms to non-volatile storage, export telemetry to the laboratory logbook, and power down all high-frequency instrumentation.
6. Raw Experimental Observations & Data Tabulation
All experimental observations were recorded under steady-state thermal and electromagnetic equilibrium. The table below summarizes the recorded telemetry across the experimental domain.
| Trial # | Transmitter RF Power Level P_t (dBm) | Received Power at Boresight P_r (dBm) | Transformed x | Transformed y | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.0 | 11.988 | 5.000 | 11.988 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 10.0 | 11.975 | 10.000 | 11.975 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 15.0 | 11.963 | 15.000 | 11.963 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 20.0 | 11.95 | 20.000 | 11.950 | 0.000 |
| 5 | 25.0 | 11.938 | 25.000 | 11.938 | 0.000 |
| 6 | 30.0 | 11.925 | 30.000 | 11.925 | 0.000 |
7. Worked Calculation for Representative Observation
For Trial 3 (Transmitter Power = 15.0 dBm):
y_3 = m \cdot x_3 + b = P_r = 1.0000 · 15.0 - 18.5000
Derived Parameter Value = 1.0 dB/dB
8. Regression Analysis, Gradient & Parameter Extraction
Ordinary least-squares (OLS) linear regression was performed across the six observation pairs. The regression statistics are summarized below:
Intercept b = Calculated baseline offset
Correlation Coefficient R² = 1.000000
Standard Error of Slope SE_m = ±0.00005 dB/dB
9. Uncertainty Propagation & Comparison with Reference
Measurement uncertainty was calculated following the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Type A uncertainty evaluated from observation residuals yielded u_A = 0.00015. Type B instrumental calibration uncertainty from the 6.5-digit multimeter was u_B = 0.00035. The combined expanded uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval (coverage factor k = 2) is:
\[ U = k \cdot \sqrt{u_A^2 + u_B^2} = 2 \cdot \sqrt{(0.00015)^2 + (0.00035)^2} = \pm 0.00076\text{ dB/dB} \]The experimental estimate of 1.0 dB/dB agrees with the theoretical reference value (1.0 dB/dB) within an absolute deviation of 0.012%, well within the expanded uncertainty band.
10. Engineering Discussion & Phenomenological Interpretations
The experimental results confirm the theoretical behavior of half-wave dipole antenna. The strict linearity observed across all six test points validates the assumption of linear, low-distortion communication channel characteristics. Harmonic distortion and phase noise were effectively suppressed through proper impedance matching and high-Q resonant filtering. The minor residual fluctuations observed are attributable to thermal Johnson–Nyquist noise and quantization resolution in the digital storage oscilloscope.
11. Industrial Applications & Telecommunication Practice
The communication engineering principles demonstrated in this laboratory form the core foundation of numerous modern telecommunication and RF systems, including:
- Cellular & Wireless Communications (5G/6G & Wi-Fi 7): Multi-carrier OFDM modulation, massive MIMO beamforming, quadrature amplitude modulation (1024-QAM), and low-density parity-check (LDPC) coding.
- Satellite & Aerospace Telemetry: Deep-space communication links, Doppler shift tracking, phased array radar systems, and direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) GPS/Galileo navigation.
- High-Speed Fiber-Optic Backbones: Coherent optical transceivers, wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM), semiconductor laser modulation, and low-latency transoceanic links.
- Broadcast & Digital Media Infrastructure: Digital audio/video broadcasting (DAB/DVB-T2), emergency communications, and software-defined radio (SDR) platforms.
12. Conclusion & Recommendations
The experimental investigation of Half-Wave Dipole Antenna E-Plane and H-Plane Polar Radiation Patterns and Gain was completed with complete success. The linear regression model verified the governing transfer equation with R² = 1.000000. All RF safety protocols, 50-ohm termination standards, and precision measurement guidelines were strictly observed. For future investigations, automated GPIB/VISA telemetry acquisition and anechoic chamber testing are recommended to characterize ultra-wideband frequency responses.
This report presents simulated benchmark observations generated for demonstration and academic instruction purposes. When submitting coursework, replace all numerical values with your actual laboratory workbench observations.