Civil Engineering / Los Angeles Abrasion
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 37 · CIVIL ENGINEERING

Los Angeles Abrasion lab report

A worked los angeles abrasion lab report with sample observation tables, regression plots, calculations, and error analysis.

WORKED EXAMPLE · BENCHMARK OBSERVATIONS

A complete example civil engineering laboratory report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report illustrates formal civil engineering data reduction, instrument calibration tares, and structural parameter estimation. Replace its observations with your own experimental telemetry when preparing a civil engineering laboratory report submission.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Resistance to Degradation of Coarse Aggregates by Abrasion & Impact (Los Angeles Machine). Determine the Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion Value of coarse mineral aggregates subjected to combined mechanical impact, crushing, and abrasive grinding in the rotating steel drum according to ASTM C131 / AASHTO T96.

2. Abstract

Six controlled civil engineering laboratory observations were systematically evaluated across operational settings Revolutions N = 100.0 revs to Revolutions N = 500.0 revs for Resistance to Degradation of Coarse Aggregates by Abrasion & Impact (Los Angeles Machine). Ordinary least-squares regression yielded an empirical Aggregate Abrasion Degradation Rate of 2.4500 g/rev (difference from theoretical reference = 0.0000%). The empirical telemetry conclusively validates the fundamental civil engineering continuum and constitutive formulation with R² = 1.000000. The investigation demonstrates stable structural and physical behavior, measurement reproducibility, and strict adherence to international ASTM, AASHTO, and ISO standards.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

In civil highway and pavement engineering, coarse mineral aggregates comprise 90% to 95% of the total mass of asphalt concrete mixtures and up to 80% of Portland cement concrete pavements. During pavement construction (stockpiling, pneumatic mixing, vibratory roller compaction) and throughout service life under heavy pneumatic commercial truck wheel traffic, coarse aggregates are subjected to intense mechanical crushing, edge grinding, and impact degradation. Standardized under ASTM C131 / AASHTO T96, the Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion Test evaluates aggregate mechanical toughness and abrasion resistance. A clean, oven-dried 5000 g aggregate sample of specified gradation (Grading A, B, C, or D) is charged into a hollow steel drum (711 mm internal diameter, 508 mm length) along with an abrasive charge of 6 to 12 cast-iron or steel spheres (approx. 46.8 mm diameter, 390 to 445 g each). As the drum rotates at 30 to 33 rpm, an internal radial shelf catches the aggregates and steel spheres, carrying them upward until they drop 700 mm onto the opposite drum wall, inflicting severe impact crushing combined with mutual abrasive friction. After 500 complete revolutions, the aggregate charge is removed, dry-sieved over a 1.70 mm (No. 12) sieve, and washed to determine the loss percentage: LA Loss (%) = [(M_initial - M_retained) / M_initial] · 100. Highway agency specifications restrict LA loss to ≤ 25% for high-speed wearing courses and ≤ 40% for base courses. In this laboratory experiment, degraded fines mass is monitored across revolution increments from 100 to 500 revs to calibrate degradation rate slope = 2.4500 g/rev (LA loss = 24.5%).

Fines = 2.4500 · N

The governing physical or constitutive relationship was linearized into the coordinate form y = mx + b. Here, the independent coordinate x represents Drum revolution cycles N (revolutions), and the dependent coordinate y represents Degraded mineral fines mass passing 1.70 mm sieve (g). The gradient m directly determines Aggregate Abrasion Degradation Rate, while the intercept b accounts for baseline tare values or reference offsets. Linear transformation enables robust parameter estimation via ordinary least squares without non-linear numerical divergence. Plotting transformed observation pairs displays structural stiffness, material strength multipliers, soil shear envelopes, or hydraulic ratings directly as linear slopes.

5. Method

  1. Wash crushed basalt aggregate to remove dust; sieve into Grading B fractions (2500 g passing 19.0 mm / retained 12.5 mm, and 2500 g passing 12.5 mm / retained 9.5 mm); oven dry at 110 °C for 16 hours to constant mass M_initial = 5000.0 g.
  2. Clean interior of LA machine drum; inspect shelf for wear; place 5000.0 g aggregate charge and exactly 11 steel abrasive spheres into drum; seal dust-tight cover plate.
  3. Set digital counter to target revolutions (100, 180, 260, 340, 420, and 500 revs); run machine at 31 rpm; observe sound of abrasive ball impacts.
  4. Open drum cover; discharge entire mixture into catching pan; separate steel abrasive spheres using magnet; inspect aggregate breakdown.
  5. Pass pulverized aggregate over 1.70 mm sieve; wash retained material over the sieve with running tap water until wash water runs clear.
  6. Oven dry washed aggregate retained on 1.70 mm sieve at 110 °C; weigh dry retained mass M_retained; compute degraded fines mass M_fines = M_initial - M_retained; calculate LA Abrasion Loss percentage.

6. Observations and calculation table

All civil engineering observations use strictly controlled 64-bit IEEE 754 precision buffers. Residuals are computed relative to the ordinary least-squares regression line.

Table 1. Six simulated observations; x and y represent transformed civil engineering metrics.
No.Drum Revolution Cycles N (revs)Degraded Fines Mass Passing 1.70 mm Sieve (g)Drum revolution cycles N (revolutions)Degraded mineral fines mass passing 1.70 mm sieve (g)Fitted yResidual
1100.0245.0100.0000245.0000245.0000-0.0000
2180.0441.0180.0000441.0000441.0000-0.0000
3260.0637.0260.0000637.0000637.00000.0000
4340.0833.0340.0000833.0000833.0000-0.0000
5420.01029.0420.00001029.00001029.00000.0000
6500.01225.0500.00001225.00001225.00000.0000

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

For input Revolutions N = 100.0 revs: Measured Degraded Fines Mass Passing 1.70 mm Sieve = 245.0000 g. Transformed coordinates: independent x = 100.0000, dependent y = 245.0000.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

98.0052.00416.50176.00735.00300.001053.50424.001372.00548.00Drum revolution cycles N (revolutions)Degraded mineral fines mass passing 1.70 mm sieve (g)

Circular markers represent empirical structural observations. The solid line represents the ordinary least-squares linear fit.

x̄ = 300.0000; ȳ = 735.0000
Σ(x − x̄)² = 112000.0000
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 274400.0000
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 2.45000000
b = ȳ − mx̄ = 0.00000000
y = 2.4500 · x + 0.0000 ⟹ Target Aggregate Abrasion Degradation Rate = 2.4500 g/rev (theoretical = 2.4500)

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − theoretical value| / |theoretical value| × 100 = 0.0000%.

For n = 6 observations, Σresidual² = 1.696e-26; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 1.946e-16. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 6.415e-14.

Propagating the fit parameters yields a fit standard error of 1.946e-16 g/rev, with an ideal coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000.

In civil engineering structural materials testing, geomechanics verification, and hydraulics modeling, empirical uncertainties arise from material microstructural heterogeneity, aggregate packing variations, transducer electronic drift (64-bit IEEE 754 precision digital acquisition), and environmental temperature fluctuations. The ordinary least-squares regression across n = 6 standardized test intervals yields unbiased minimum-variance estimators for both slope and intercept. Because the underlying mechanics—including Hooke's elasticity law, Darcy's porous transport, Bernoulli energy conservation, and Mohr-Coulomb shear strength—adhere strictly to continuum physical principles, residual dispersions remain tightly bounded, yielding an ideal coefficient of determination R² ≥ 0.999999 and confirming the theoretical formulation. Systematic errors (such as machine frame compliance, load cell tare offsets, and temperature drifts) are eliminated using certified calibration standards and differential tare subtraction. Uncertainties in derived moduli, shear strength parameters, and transport coefficients are evaluated via multivariate error propagation.

10. Result and discussion

Aggregate Abrasion Degradation Rate = 2.4500 g/rev
Theoretical reference value: 2.4500 g/rev

The empirical laboratory observations provide rigorous quantitative verification of Resistance to Degradation of Coarse Aggregates by Abrasion & Impact (Los Angeles Machine). In civil engineering mechanics of materials, structural analysis, geotechnical engineering, and hydraulics, physical systems are governed by macroscopic equilibrium, compatibility, and constitutive relationships. Across all six observation trials, the empirical slope m = 2.4500 confirms the theoretical model with near-zero residual variance. Furthermore, comparison with established civil engineering benchmarks (Timoshenko & Gere; Terzaghi & Peck; Chow; Neville; and ASTM standards) underscores vital infrastructure design principles including structural safety factors, serviceability deflection limits, and environmental durability. Residual analysis confirms homoscedastic dispersion without systematic non-linear curvature, validating the underlying model assumptions.

11. Precautions and limitations

The civil engineering physical models apply within the specified calibrated operational window (100.0 to 500.0 revs). Tested on crushed basalt highway coarse aggregate (Grading B, initial mass M = 5000.0 g, 11 steel abrasive spheres). Linear degradation model relates fines mass to drum revolutions with slope 2.4500 g/rev.

12. Conclusion

This laboratory investigation quantitatively verified the mathematical formulation and physical behavior of Resistance to Degradation of Coarse Aggregates by Abrasion & Impact (Los Angeles Machine). Through rigorous tracking across six observation points, we confirmed an empirical Aggregate Abrasion Degradation Rate of 2.4500 g/rev matching the theoretical reference 2.4500 g/rev within 0.0000% error. The investigation demonstrates why this civil engineering testing method serves as an indispensable cornerstone in infrastructure design, structural safety assurance, and construction quality control.

In-Depth Technical Supplement & Structural Engineering Derivation

1. Objective & Practical Significance

This laboratory investigation evaluated the mechanical degradation resistance and impact toughness of crushed basalt coarse mineral aggregates using the Los Angeles Testing Machine according to ASTM C131 / AASHTO T96. Across six systematic rotation cycles ($N = 100, 180, 260, 340, 420,$ and $500\text{ revs}$), degraded fines passing the $1.70\text{ mm}$ (No. 12) sieve were quantified to calibrate the degradation rate slope and evaluate compliance with highway pavement wearing course specifications.

2. Governing Transport Equations & Degradation Scaling

Mineral fines mass $M_{fines}$ generated by combined ball impact and abrasive grinding scales linearly with drum revolutions:

\[ M_{fines} = k_{la} \cdot N \]

Linear regression of fines mass (g) versus revolutions yields degradation rate $k_{la} = 2.4500\text{ g/rev}$. The standard 500-revolution LA Abrasion Loss is:

\[ \text{LA Loss (\%)} = \frac{k_{la} \cdot 500}{5000.0} \times 100 = 24.50\% \]

3. Experimental Apparatus & Instrumentation Specification

Testing utilized a standard Humboldt Los Angeles abrasion machine ($711 \pm 5\text{ mm}$ internal diameter, $508 \pm 5\text{ mm}$ length, wall thickness $12.7\text{ mm}$) equipped with a rigid radial shelf ($89\text{ mm}$ width) rotating at $31.5\text{ rpm}$. The abrasive charge comprised 11 hardened chrome steel spheres ($46.8\text{ mm}$ diameter, combined mass $4584 \pm 10\text{ g}$). Residues were washed over a certified W.S. Tyler $1.70\text{ mm}$ sieve and weighed on an Ohaus digital platform balance ($\pm 0.5\text{ g}$).

4. Standard Operating Procedure & Measurement Protocols

A $5000.0\text{ g}$ clean, oven-dried sample of crushed basalt was prepared to Grading B ($2500\text{ g}$ passing $19.0\text{ mm}$ / retained $12.5\text{ mm}$, and $2500\text{ g}$ passing $12.5\text{ mm}$ / retained $9.5\text{ mm}$). Aggregates and 11 steel balls were placed into the drum. Machine was run across systematic intervals ($100$ to $500\text{ revs}$). Samples were discharged, steel balls separated, residue dry-sieved and washed over the $1.70\text{ mm}$ sieve, oven-dried at $110^\circ\text{C}$ to constant mass, and weighed to record $M_{retained}$.

5. Safety Analysis, Hazard Mitigation & Personal Protection

Drum rotation generates high acoustic noise levels ($92\text{ dBA}$) and respirable crystalline silica dust. Personnel wore ear defenders, N95 dust respirators, safety glasses, and steel-toed boots. The machine safety enclosure was interlocked during rotation.

6. Raw Experimental Observations & Systematic Data Records

Simulated demonstration data. The following systematic observations were recorded for initial sample mass $M_{initial} = 5000.0\text{ g}$:

Test PointDrum Revolutions NRetained Coarse Mass (g)Degraded Fines Mass (g)Cumulative LA Loss (%)Degradation Status
11004755.0245.04.90%Edge rounding, initial chip fracture
21804559.0441.08.82%Moderate corner cleavage
32604363.0637.012.74%Steady particle attrition
43404167.0833.016.66%Uniform surface micro-fracture
54203971.01029.020.58%Sub-rounded tough cores
65003775.01225.024.50%Final standard endpoint

7. Quantitative Mathematical Analysis & Regression Models

Linear regression of degraded fines mass against drum revolution cycles yields:

\[ M_{fines} = 2.45000 \cdot N + 0.00000 \]

with coefficient of determination $R^2 = 1.000000$. The experimental degradation rate $k_{la} = 2.4500\text{ g/rev}$ yields a final Los Angeles Abrasion Loss of $24.50\%$, matching the design benchmark ($0.00\%$ deviation).

8. Rigorous Error Analysis & Uncertainty Propagation

Balance mass measurement uncertainty is $\delta M = \pm 0.5\text{ g}$, and revolution count uncertainty is $\delta N = \pm 1\text{ rev}$. Propagating into LA loss:

\[ \frac{\delta \text{LA}}{\text{LA}} = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\sqrt{2} \delta M}{M_{initial} - M_{retained}} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\delta M}{M_{initial}} \right)^2 } = \pm 0.06\% \]

The reported Los Angeles Abrasion Value is $\text{LA Loss} = 24.50 \pm 0.02\%$.

9. Engineering Discussion & Phenomenological Interpretation

The strict linear degradation progression indicates steady, uniform particle attrition without catastrophic structural splitting of aggregate cores. Microscopic examination of retained particles revealed rounded corners without micro-cracking networks, characteristic of high-strength dense basalt. The final loss ($24.50\%$) satisfies the strict AASHTO M283 specification threshold ($\le 25\%$) for high-stress asphalt wearing surfaces.

10. Industrial Pavement Design & Material Specification Compliance

In highway construction, aggregates with $\text{LA Loss} \le 25\%$ provide superior rutting resistance and prevent aggregate degradation under $100\text{ kN}$ heavy axle passes. Aggregates exceeding $40\%$ are relegated to granular base courses or embankment fills.

11. Self-Assessment Conceptual Questions & Model Answers

Q1: Why do soft limestone aggregates exhibit non-linear LA loss profiles that plateau early?
A1: Soft sedimentary limestones experience rapid catastrophic cleavage fracturing during the first 100 revolutions; once sharp corners break off, rounded cores offer higher geometric resistance to subsequent ball impact.

Q2: How does the ratio of 100-revolution loss to 500-revolution loss indicate aggregate uniformity?
A2: A $100/500$ revolution ratio greater than $0.20$ signals high surface friability or soft outer weathered crusts, even if the total 500-revolution loss passes overall specifications.

12. Concluding Summary & Verified Engineering Metric

The Los Angeles Abrasion investigation characterized the impact toughness of crushed basalt aggregate. The verified degradation rate $k_{la} = 2.4500\text{ g/rev}$ ($R^2 = 1.000000$) establishes an LA Abrasion Value of $24.50\%$, demonstrating full compliance with premium highway wearing course specifications.