Aerospace & Aeronautical Engineering / Cylinder Vortex Shedding
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 10 · AEROSPACE & AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

Cylinder Vortex Shedding theory

Understand cylinder vortex shedding: governing aerodynamic equations, shock relations, stability derivatives, and propulsion models.

Aerodynamic and physical foundations of Cylinder Vortex Shedding.

Flow past a bluff body such as a circular cylinder represents one of the canonical problems in fluid mechanics, demonstrating the dramatic contrast between potential flow theory and real viscous flow dynamics. In ideal inviscid potential flow, d'Alembert's paradox predicts zero drag because symmetrical streamlines produce identical stagnation pressures on both the front and rear faces. In real viscous fluids, however, the adverse pressure gradient on the downstream shoulder forces the boundary layers to separate symmetrically near theta = 82 degrees. The two detached free shear layers carry intense opposite-signed vorticity into the wake. Due to hydrodynamic instability, these shear layers roll up into discrete alternating vortices that detach periodically—a phenomenon known as the von Kármán vortex street. The alternating shed vortices create oscillating asymmetric low-pressure zones that generate periodic transverse lift forces (vortex-induced vibration) and substantial pressure drag. The fundamental vortex shedding frequency f_s scales linearly with the ratio of free-stream velocity to cylinder diameter V_inf / D according to the non-dimensional Strouhal number St = f_s * D / V_inf. Over the subcritical Reynolds number range (300 < Re_D < 10^5), Strouhal number remains remarkably constant at St approx 0.205. In this experiment, a hot-wire anemometer or dynamic pressure probe positioned in the cylinder wake detects the frequency of passing vortices across airspeeds, providing a direct linear fit to extract the universal Strouhal number.

f_s = St \cdot \left(\frac{V_\infty}{D}\right) \implies f_s = m \cdot \left(\frac{V_\infty}{D}\right) + b

Viva voce questions & analytical theory

What is the physical origin of the von Kármán vortex street behind a circular cylinder?

The adverse pressure gradient on the downstream half of the cylinder causes the boundary layers to separate. The two separated free shear layers carry opposing vorticity. Through hydrodynamic instability, one shear layer rolls into a concentrated vortex, drawing the opposite shear layer across the centerline, which cuts off circulation and triggers periodic alternating shedding.

How is the Strouhal number defined and what is its typical value for a circular cylinder?

The Strouhal number is a non-dimensional frequency defined as St = f_s * D / V_inf, where f_s is the vortex shedding frequency, D is the characteristic cross-stream dimension (diameter), and V_inf is the approach velocity. For a smooth circular cylinder in the subcritical regime, St is approximately 0.205.

What is the phenomenon of vortex-induced vibration (VIV) and lock-in?

The alternating shedding of vortices creates an oscillating transverse lift force on the cylinder. When the vortex shedding frequency matches a structural natural frequency of the cylinder, the body begins to vibrate. The structural motion can take control of shedding, locking the frequency over a range of velocities—a dangerous condition known as lock-in.

What is the 'drag crisis' of a circular cylinder and at what Reynolds number does it occur?

Near critical Reynolds number Re_crit approx 3 x 10^5, the boundary layer transitions from laminar to turbulent before separating. The high-energy turbulent boundary layer resists the adverse pressure gradient longer, delaying separation from theta = 82 deg to theta = 120 deg. This narrows the wake and drops the drag coefficient precipitously from C_D = 1.2 to 0.3.

Why are helical strakes wrapped around tall industrial smokestacks and offshore oil risers?

Helical strakes disrupt the spanwise correlation of vortex shedding. By forcing vortices to detach at different phases along the height, strakes prevent coherent spanwise alternating forces, effectively suppressing vortex-induced vibrations and structural fatigue.

How did d'Alembert's paradox fail to predict the large drag of a circular cylinder in real fluids?

d'Alembert used inviscid, irrotational potential flow theory, which assumes zero viscosity. Potential flow produces perfectly symmetrical streamlines and pressure distributions on the front and rear of the cylinder, yielding zero net drag. In real fluids, boundary layer separation breaks this symmetry, creating a massive low-pressure wake.

Experimental precautions and wind tunnel safety

  • Handle the fragile 5-micrometer tungsten hot-wire probe with extreme care; avoid mechanical contact or excessive electrical current.
  • Verify that the cylinder is rigidly clamped to eliminate flow-induced structural lock-in vibrations that distort shedding frequency.
  • Check that test section sidewall boundary layers are blocked or trimmed using endplates to maintain two-dimensional vortex shedding.
  • Set appropriate anti-aliasing low-pass analog filters on the DAQ input before computing digital FFT spectrums.

Theoretical assumptions & flow limits

  • Strouhal number invariance (St approx 0.205) is valid in the subcritical regime; across the critical drag crisis (Re > 3 x 10^5), the vortex street becomes broadband.
  • Endplate clearance gaps can introduce small spanwise cell dislocations in the shedding frequency.
  • High acoustic noise in the wind tunnel test section can cause weak acoustic locking of the natural shedding frequency.
  • Assumes isothermal conditions so that hot-wire temperature calibration remains drift-free.
↳
Connect aerodynamic theory to empirical telemetry.

Linear regression of vortex shedding frequency against velocity-to-diameter ratio yields a Strouhal number St = 0.2050 with R^2 > 0.999999.